contents of this page |
Introduction |
|
The Barrys |
Delapidation & vandalism |
Redevelopment plans |

caption
|
Introduction
The Norfolk Pubs web-site shows this to have been a licenced house in 1851 when the
tenant or licencee was Robert Clarke, but it has been a private house since 1943 when
the licence was surrendered and the owners (Huntingdon Breweries?) sold the premises to
the then tenant.
back to contents
|
Years |
Owner/Brewery |
‡ |
? to 1933 |
Lindsells, Chatteris |
np |
1933-1943 |
Huntingdon Breweries |
np |
1943 |
sold to tenant |
np |
|
|

In 1995 when Helen & Patrick Barry lived here. Photo by, & courtesy of, Tony Smart,
Cambridge
back to contents
|
Years |
Licencee/tenant |
‡ |
in 1851 |
Robert Clarke |
np |
in 1881 |
Marian Matthewson |
ts |
1883-1896 |
Lewis Sisson |
ts |
in 1900 |
William Sisson |
ts |
by 1904 |
Henry Kent |
np |
1916-1937 |
Henry Kent |
ts |
1934 |
Eliza Ann Kent |
np |
1941 |
"The Brewery Co" (?) |
np |
1943 |
licence surrended |
np |
‡ sources : np = Norfolk Pubs; ts = Tony Smart
|
|

In 2009. Neglected and boarded-up. Photo by Peter Cox, Welney
back to contents
|
|
|

In 2010. Even more neglected except for the care taken to stick up a "private keep out"
sign. Photo by Eddy Edwards.
back to contents
|
|
|
Delapidation and vandalism
back to contents
|
|
|
Re-deveopment Plans
The planning authority for this property is the West Norfolk Borough Council.
Their website shows the following applications have been made to demolish the existing property and redevelop the site:
Ref No. 11/01212/O, 16th July 2011
Application on behalf of Mr.J.Barry for a replacement 4/5 bedroom Detached Dwelling House and detached double garage.
Application withdrawn in Oct 2011 pending consideration of comments made
|
|
|
Ref No. 11/02061/0, 2nd Dec 2011
Outline application on behalf of Mr J. Barry for a replacement 3 bedroom detached dwelling house with detached double garage.
The pre-amble to the application included the following statements:
"This amended Design & Access Statement follows the withdrawal of 11/01212/O based on 3 key
points for refusal, we have addressed these issues below;
The first was that the Environment Agency felt that the increase in footprint of the replacement
dwelling and as a result of this the submitted Flood Risk Assessment did not justify the increase in
footprint in accordance with PPS25 – we have addressed this concern after discussions with the EA
and attach an amended FRA in support of this amended application.
The second points was as a result of the condition of the existing dwelling in regards to ecology, there
were a number of entry points that could allow occupancy from animals, or protected species. We
therefore instructed local firm Phillip Parker Associates to carry out a scoping assessment and attach
their report to this application.
The third issue was a tree survey, we appointed a local arboriculturalist Giles Landscapes Ltd and
attach their report for consideration."
Application refused 14th March, 2012.
Reasons: "Whilst the principle of development is
acceptable in land use terms, the building has been vandalised and vacant for some time and its surrounds has been open
to wildlife. An ecology report submitted with this application identifies the possibility of protected species (bats, badgers and
otters) being affected by the proposed development and recommends additional survey work to make a full assessment and
define any mitigation measures. On the basis of the information provided the applicant has failed to demonstrate that there
will not be an adverse impact upon such protected species and their habitat and therefore the proposal, at this time, fails to
comply with the provisions of PPS9 and Core Strategy Policies CS06 and CS12 of the Local Development Framework.".
back to contents
|
|
|
|
|
|